BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE

PSYCHOLOGY 361 – SPRING 2008

Tues & Thurs 8:30am-10:20am, BGC B10

 

INSTRUCTOR: William M. Struthers
OFFICE: BGC M246
PHONE: 752-7046 (office); 752-5773 (lab)
EMAIL: William.M.Struthers@wheaton.edu
OFFICE HOURS: M 9:30am-10:30am, 11:30-12:30, TR 1:15-3:15pm

COURSE WEBPAGE: www.wheaton.edu/psychology/undergrad/faculty/wms/courses/psyc361.html

REQUIRED TEXTS:
Biological Psychology, Klein and Thorne, 1st Ed. Worth Publishers. 2007.

 

COURSE OBJECTIVES:
The goal of this course is to provide instruction and expose students to neuroanatomy, neuroendocrinology, functional neurobiology and the neurochemical basis of behavior. Students will be provided with a solid background in the fundamentals of neuroanatomy, cellular and molecular processes in neural action, and current methods in brain research and how neural activity underlies behavior.  These topics will be used to demonstrate how our knowledge of behavior is informed by each of these levels of analysis of the nervous system.  In addition, emphasis will be placed on how external sensory stimuli impact the organism and how that information is processed and acted on.  As part of this training, this course will involve lectures and labs although class sessions may occasionally have a seminar format.  It is important to note that any competent psychologist maintains a working knowledge of the central and peripheral nervous systems at the micro-, macro- and functional levels. 

 

INTEGRATION:

While a variety of integration frameworks exist within the context of psychology and theology, the process of integration utilized by the instructor will be based on the following assumptions:

1.      Jesus Christ is the Maker of all that is, seen and unseen.

2.      The Holy Spirit actively works to transform, heal and minister to our entire being.

3.      Scriptural Truth (big “T” truth) maintains a position of authority over all other epistemological methods (including the scientific method) whenever it speaks specifically to any issue.

4.      While Scripture speaks with a variety of voices on a variety of issues, it was not intended to be read as a scientific text.  Therefore, we should neither read it as such nor require it to be a science textbook.

5.      Knowledge (or little “t” truth) obtained through the natural and social sciences is part of an ongoing process utilizing probabilistic evaluation of theories.  Theoretical deduction and empirical induction are rooted in the empirical observation of Creation.

6.      Christians have been given the responsibility to care for and study Creation as part of our worship of our Maker.

7.      Christian theology can be either a priori or a posteriori.  Examples of a priori theology include the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds.  The Wheaton College Statement of Faith is another example.  A priori theology deals with first order assumptions about the nature of God.  A posteriori theology involves the testing of theological matters and is, therefore, similar to the science of psychology.  Utilizing induction and deduction, truth claims are posited and then evaluated.  The principles of reliability and validity apply to both the science of psychology and the science of theology.

8.      The nature of the integrative process varies widely within the discipline of psychology.  Specifically, integration of many Biblical and theological subjects occurs with little difficulty in the applied and clinical areas of psychology.  Integration in the more empirical and biological areas of psychology is rooted more in the a priori assumptions of the scientific method and may not yield clearly empirical, or what we might expect to be overtly Christian, hypotheses.

9.      Within the context of this class, integration is based more in development of a Christian worldview, and less in the descriptive and functional analysis of the central nervous system.

 

The process of integration in class will generally take the form of discussion of relevant issues within the areas studied from a Biblical and Christian theological perspective.  Students are also encouraged to raise issues in theology or Biblical interpretation during class discussion which are relevant to the material being covered.

 

CLASS STRUCTURE, STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES, AND GRADING:

Class will begin promptly at 8:30am and will end at 10:20am.  There will be one 10 minute break during each lecture session and instruction will begin promptly after ten minutes.  Students are expected to have completed the readings prior to coming to the lecture session they were assigned for.

 

In-Class Exams: There will be four objective tests covering material from the readings, lectures, and labs. These exams will be short answer/fill in the blank questions and multiple choice. Exams will be given at the beginning of the lecture session will be no more than 2 hours in duration.  Each test will be worth 125 points (500pts total). Each exam will be a sectional exam with questions only taken from the chapters assigned prior to that exam .  After the first exam each following exam will primarily be on material covered during that section, but will require/assume an understanding of basic principles and structures from the earlier exams. Exam #2 will also include a sheep brain and rat atlas lab practical component. More information on these will be provided in class.

 

Policy Regarding Make-up Exams:  Make-up exams will only be given as a result of illness (verified by the health service) or death in the family. Make-up exams will be of the same format and number of questions, but different from the regularly scheduled exam.

 

Extra Credit:  Five points extra credit will be given for a typed review (no more than 2 pages) of an article from a neuroscience journal dealing with a behavioral topic. Only one review may be submitted for a maximum of 5 extra credit points for the semester. This may be handed in no later than the last day of lecture (5/1). Additional opportunities for extra credit (i.e. participation in a psychology department experiment, attending a colloquium) will be announced in class.

 

Class Attendance, Participation and Out-of-Class Responsibilities:  All students are encouraged to attend the lectures, although attendance will not be recorded. Students are expected to have read the assigned text and any other readings relevant to the topic(s) to be covered prior to coming to lecture. It is the student's responsibility to be aware of additional information covered in the lectures not found in the book as well as any changes in the syllabus announced in class. While participation in class discussion is not part of the grading criteria, it is my experience that students who actively participate in class generally attain a greater understanding of the material and its relevance. 

Academic Dishonesty: Plagiarism and Cheating:  In this course, plagiarism and cheating cannot be tolerated. This policy can be found in the Psychology Department's Student Handbook which defines plagiarism as the "theft of paragraphs, sentences, phrases or ideas without giving proper credit to the person who originated them" (p. 7). In this course, cheating--that is, representing others' work as your own—is most often committed in the copying of assignments or exam answers.  In addition, academic dishonesty may also be committed by sharing this information with another (i.e. allowing a classmate to copy your assignments, etc). Remember that a course grade or even your undergraduate career could be jeopardized by cheating and or plagiarism. Also, please read over the section on Academic Integrity contained in the current Wheaton College Catalog.  Any student found to have committed academic dishonesty will receive a failing grade of zero (0) for the assignment/exam and may be subject to additional discipline based on the severity of the offense.

GRADING SCALE

GRADE

POINTS

 

GRADE

POINTS

A

460-500

 

C+

390-399.5

A-

450-459.5

 

C

360-389.5

B+

440-449.5

 

C-

350-359.5

B

410-439.5

 

D

300-349.5

B-

400-409.5

 

F

0-299.5

Wheaton College Policy on Academic Integrity and Plagarism
It is the responsibility of every faculty member to disseminate to students an awareness of what constitutes honesty and dishonesty in academic work. Faculty members are responsible to define in their courses what they consider to be plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration, violations of the conditions under which the work is to be done, fabrication of data, unauthorized use of computer data, and excessive revisions by someone other than the student.  A faculty member shall assign a grade of zero to any individual assignment or test in which a student has been dishonest. In the case of a second instance of dishonesty, a student will be dropped from that course with a grade of F and placed on a disciplinary status up to and including dismissal (See College catalog statement on Integrity of Scholarship).  Plagiarism is the act of incorporating another's ideas or expression in one's written work without indicating its origin and thus misrepresenting someone else's work as one's own. The verbatim incorporation of another's work into your own without proper reference is the most obvious example of plagiarism. A more subtle form is to use the ideas of others; for instance, their form of analysis of a particular problem or their way of organizing a particular body of information. All forms of plagiarism are unethical. It is the student's responsibility to document carefully the sources of his or her work.  Instances of plagiarism obviously vary in severity. A careless solitary failure to cite properly a source is technically plagiarism, but is one which anyone might commit without intending to do so. Systemic and apparently purposeful instances of wholesale plagiarism are another matter. Cases of plagiarism will be addressed on an individual basis.

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND DIVERSITY
As part of its mission statement, the Wheaton College Psychology department is sensitive to issues of culture and diversity in the training of students.  We maintain a special concern for those persons who have been marginalized by our society on any basis, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, age, and social class.  In this course, concern about individual differences and diversity are addressed during sections of the course where we examine the access to medical treatment, psychopathology, cultural impact on the interpretation of neuroscientific information, male/female differences, and the appropriate use of medication across the life span.


COURSE SCHEDULE
Click on the lecture title for the in-class outlines and notes
.

Tuesday

Thursday

January 15
Review of Syllabus
Introduction and History

Ch.1

January 17
The Nervous System & Neuronal Structure
Reading: Supplemental Chapter

January 22
The Nervous System & Neuronal Structure
Ch 2.
Lab: Sheep Brain Dissection

January 24
Electrical Potentials and IntraNeuronal Transmission
Ch. 4

January 29
Electrical Potentials and IntraNeuronal Transmission
Ch. 4
Lab: Sheep Brain Dissection

January 31
Synaptic Transmission
Ch. 4

February 5
NO CLASS – FACULTY DEVELOPMENT DAY

February 7
Synaptic Transmission
Ch. 4

February 12
EXAM  1

February 14
Neural Development
Ch. 3

February 19
Neural Plasticity
Ch. 3

February 21
Psychopharmacology
Ch. 5

February 26
Psychopharmacology
Ch. 5

February 28
Neuroendocrinology
Reserve Reading - TBA

March 4
Visual Systems
Ch. 6

March 6
Visual Systems
Ch. 6

SPRING BREAK – NO CLASSES

March 18
EXAM  2

March 20
Auditory, Chemosensory, Somatosensory Systems
Ch.7

March 25
Somatosensory Systems
Ch. 8

March 27
Motor Systems,
Ch.8

April 1
Motor Systems,
Ch.8

April 3
Biological Rhythms
Ch.9

April 8
Biological Rhythms
Ch.9

April 10
EXAM  3

April 15
Motivational Systems I: Eating & Drinking
Chapter 10

April 17
Motivational Systems II: Sexual Behavior
Ch. 11

April 22
Motivational Systems II: Sexual Behavior

Ch. 11

April 24
Motivational Systems III: Affect
Ch. 12

April 29
Clinical Neuroscience: Psychopathology
Ch. 15

May 1
Clinical Neuroscience: Psychopathology
Ch. 15

FINAL EXAM (EXAM 4) - Tuesday, May 6  @ 10:30am