![]() |
||||
Because academic writing is persuasive in nature, it requires a high degree of clarity to be effective. Clear writing results when what you express is unambiguously what you intend to express. You certainly dont want to confuse the person reading your paper. Clarity at a deeper level involves clarity of argument. Clarity at a surface level involves clarity of diction and sentence structure. Clarity of argumentOf the two levels, this one is far more important, since if you're unsure about what you're saying, it's unlikely anyone else will fully grasp it, either. One way to ensure clarity is to check for coherence by asking yourself two questions:
If your position changed during writing, however, be sure to change your thesis once you've finished to more accurately reflect what you're saying. For example, suppose your original thesis is: |
||||
|
The federal government should fund after-school programs for inner-city youths because the programs lower crime rates. |
||||
If another reason becomes more compelling to you as you write, however, by all means discuss it--you want the strongest paper possible. Just remember to change your thesis so you don't confuse your readers; if they expect to learn about how after-school programs lower crime, but find out instead how they will improve community development, they will be confused. In other words, make sure your points aren't supporting a different thesis. |
||||
| The federal government should fund after-school programs for inner-city youths because such programs reduce crime and enhance community development. | ||||
Besides making sure your paper is coherent, you should also check your argument for clarity. Unclear arguments often result when you fail to: Make sure your assumptions are validSuppose a paper has the following thesis: |
||||
| Since God isn't the source of morals, culture is the sole arbiter of what is acceptable behavior. | ||||
If the paper goes on to discuss the second point and not the first, the author has assumed something that not everyone agrees with. To the person who doesn't share the author's assumption, then, the argument is meaningless. Be sure to identify and then deal with any arguable assumptions. Support your position fullyReaders can disagree with your position--that's all right. When they wonder how you've come to it or what you're talking about, though, there's a problem. Check your organization and logic. If you have a confusing organization or commit logical fallacies while arguing, readers will at best be unimpressed and at worst be lost as to what you're saying. A way to check for good organization is to outline your paper--if everything fits neatly into an outline, then it's probably organized well. If not, move some of your points to other parts of your paper. You can check your logic by having other people read your paper and point out to you where they have difficulties following your argument. You can also check for obvious logical fallacies yourself. The best way to ensure clarity of thought, however, is to plan before you write. Use outlining or some form of prewriting to order your points and to give your paper organization before you start writing. Clarity of diction and sentence structureClear expression is when what you're thinking coincides with what you've written. To check for clarity, read your paper aloud and listen for awkward or unclear sentences--what sounds odd to you will probably sound odd to others, too. After you've gone through and corrected your paper, it would be good to have someone else check it over to see if you've missed anything. The following are areas to look for as you read your paper aloud:
|
||||