| Biblio Format |
Annotation |
| Abraham, K. C. "Asian Theology Looking to 21st Century."
Voices (1997): 81-98. |
Asian theologies are contextual theologies; they are also
people's theologies. Being truly rooted in the Asian realties
they are given different names such as: Theology of Struggle,
Minjung Theology, Dalit Theology, and there are women's (Feminist)
theologies, They reflect on the deeper yearnings of their religions
and cultures, critically rejecting some and reaffirming others.
In the past, the Asian churches, by an large, a product of western
missions, were content with repeating, without reflection, the
confessions of faith evolved by the Western churches. Creative
theologies in Asia began to emerge in the 19th century when
the churches started relating their faith to the questions and
concerns peculiar to Asia. This theological encounter continues
as the Church faces new problems and challenges. We have embarked
on a new journey, breaking the tutelage of our erstwhile Western
masters. A new stage in this journey has begun as we are on
the threshold of 21st century. How do we articulate our agenda
for the future? |
| Adams, Daniel J. "The Sources of Minjung Theology."
Taiwan Journal of Theology 9 (1987): 179-198. |
The period from the mid-1970's until the present has seen
the rise of numerous contextual theologies. There is perhaps
no area of the world, where contextual theology has flourished
like that of Asia, f or it was here that the concept of contextual
theology was originally developed. One of the most unique of
these theologies is also one of the least known-the minjung
theology of Korea. To date there are only a few works on minjung
theorlogy in languages other than Korea. Within Korea however,
there is an ever-growing number of works dealing with minjung
theology in the vernacular. Because minjung theology is a significant
theological movement within Korea, it is imperative that Christians
in other Asian contexts have at least a basic understanding
of what minjung theology is. |
| Bretzke, James T. "Cracking the Code: Minjung Theology
as an Expression of the Holy Spirit in Korea." Pacifica
10 (1997): 319-330. |
Minjung theology's development in Korea, as an indigenous
theology of liberation, is a genuine response to the Holy Spirit
in Asia's fastest growing Christian population, though not without
its problematic elements and critics. This article reflects
on the inculturation of minjung theology in terms of a five-stage
framework suggested by the Pentecost account in Acts 2:1-42. |
| Brown, Robert McAfee. "What Can North Americans Learn
from Minjung Theology?" In An Emerging Theology in World
Perspective: Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung
Y. Lee, 35-47. Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third Publications, 1988.
|
There are both negative and positive things for North Americans
to learn from an exposure to minjung theology. Negatively, the
most important thing is probably to acknowledge that it is not
"our" theology; that we are unlikely, for cultural,
racial, and class reasons, to be able to understand it fully;
that we are not competent to interpret it to others; and that
as a result we had better leave its exposition and appropriation
to those who have created it. Positively, we can recognize that
it is a theology indigenous to the core; that it must remain
that way; and that what it can best do for us is to stimulate
us to find some new ways of doing our own indigenous theology.
How, then, can we learn from the minjung theological experience
in ways that will first inform, then challenge, and finally
transform the North American theological experience? In dealing
with this complex matter, I first engage in the risky venture
of trying to highlight four emphases in minjung theology that
seem to offer pointers for our own theological re-thinking;
secondly, I try to look at our North American theological scene
in the light of those emphases; and finally, I offer some brief,
concluding reflections on the future of indigenous theologies. |
| Cobb, John B. "Minjung Theology and Process Theology."
In An Emerging Theology in World Perspective: Commentary on
Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung Y. Lee, 51-56. Mystic, CN:
Twenty-Third Publications, 1988. |
As minjung theology moves into this later phase, it is my
hope that there can be a growing alliance between minjung theology
and process theology. Few, if any, process theologians in the
United States have paid a price in unemployment or imprisonment
for identification with the minjung. In that sense we have not
earned the confidence of minjung theologians. But in our very
different context, focused on very different issues, we have
come to see the world in such a way that we hope to support
and encourage those who actively identify with the oppressed
and pay the price. As we seek to affect the course of events
in our churches and in our government, we need help and guidance
from Christians in Korea (and elsewhere) who understand, as
we do not, the effect of U.S. policies on the minjung of the
world. No more than the minjung theologians are able to determine
the policies of Korea are we able to determine those of the
United States. But we would like, at least, to be directing
our efforts in the right direction. For that we need their moral
support as well as their wisdom. |
| Cox, Harvey. "The Religion of Ordinary People: Toward
a North American Minjung Theology." In An Emerging Theology
in World Perspective: Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology,
ed. Jung Y. Lee, 109-114. Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third Publications,
1988. |
When one looks at minjung and the various liberation theologies
from the angle of Western academic theology, one sees that they
raise enormously critical issues for the next decades of Christian
theology. The fact is that the demographic center of Christianity
is rapidly shifting to the black, brown, yellow, poor southern
hemisphere. This means that our millennium-long habit of thinking
of Christianity as being somehow centered in Europe, with branch
offices around the world, is dying. It will not be that way
anymore and, frankly put, many of the churches in the Third
World think of this movement away from European thought patterns
as a great liberation. They rejoice that they no longer need
to think like little Europeans in order to become Christian
theologians. So the "De-Europeanizing" of Christianity
is one of the things at stake in the emergence of minjung theology.
What does the gospel look like when it's been unwrapped from
its northern, European shell and allowed to take root and flower
in a quite other culture? Concludes: We surely have minjung
faith in the USA, but we do not yet have a real minjung "theology."
We lack it in part because of the religious and political isolation
within which most of our theologians work. If we can begin to
break down that isolation, to learn from the trust in Jesus
of the black churches, the Dostoyevskian passion of the Russian
believers, and other expressions of minjung faith, then something
quite significant could begin to happen. |
| Dickson, Kwesi A. "And What of Culture? An African Reflection
on Minjung Theology." In An Emerging Theology in World
Perspective: Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung
Y. Lee, 171-181. Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third Publications, 1988.
|
I must confess at this juncture that I am operating under
a severe disability: my knowledge of the Korean situation is
very limited-it does not go much beyond what is revealed in
these essays, hence my reluctance to make a detailed assessment
of these essays in terms of the extent to which they do justice
to the Korean situation. I am also unable to fully explore how
far comparisons may be made between the analyses done in these
essays and the culturebased approach adopted by a number of
African theologians. Nevertheless, I discern in these essays
a number of ideas which I would like to comment on given my
own background. They include the differences in colonial history
of Korea and Africa; the minjung treatment of culture; emphasis
or favoritism of the poor and the powerful; and the cultural
paticularity of biblical exegesis. |
| Dong, Suh Nam. In Minjung Theology: People as the Subjects
of History, ed. Christian Conference of Asia, 155-184. Singapore:
Christian Conference of Asia, 1981. |
|
| Han, Kee Chae. "Narrative Ethics in A Minjung Context:
In the Beginning There Was a Story." Asia Journal of Theology
11:2 (1997): 221-247. |
Explores how minjung narratives shape moral character. Narrative
theology shows us the ability to do theology is in everyone
and brings theology back into the hands of the people. Focus
on how to use story rather than on how to interpret it. |
| Hong-jung, Lee. "The Minjung Behind the Folktale: An
Example of Narrative Hermeneutics." Asia Journal of Theology
8:1 (1994): 89-95. |
Uses a well-known Korean folk tale ("The Rat's Bridegroom")
to recover the reality of the Korean minjung (common person;
hopes and assumptions about realities) and highlight hermeneutical
issues. |
| Hyun, Younghak. "Minjung Theology and the Religion of
Han." East Asia Journal of Theology 3:2 (1985): 354-359 |
Minjung theology is not of, by or for the minjung people.
It does not intend to "conscientize" or agitate them.
It tries to learn who and what they are both in history and
in the current reality through what they see, what they feel,
what they perceive, what they think, what they do and how they
five, as expressed in their culture as well as in their "social
biography." It tries to learn from them. It tries to trace
the Gospel message back beyond "the Christian era"
when the church became a community of ruling elites to the earliest
church when "the sinners," those who were treated
as sinners such as prostitutes, collectors and lepers, and lowliest
ones in the society were the followers of Jesus. Out of these
theologians' involvement in the struggle to be faithful to the
gospel and to the minjung people and out of their engagement
in the above-mentioned activities, there began to emerge a new
kind of theological thinking. People began to call it a minjung
theology. It is from such a minjung theological perspective
that the religion of han, Korean Shamanism, is being given a
new look. |
| Ishida, Manabu. "Doing Theology in Japan: The Alternative
Way of Reading the Scriptures As the Book of Sacred Drama in
Dialogue with Minjung Theology." Missiology 22 (1994):
55-63. |
Even though Korean Minjung theology is rooted in the cultural
and historical context of Korea, it has direct theological relevance
to Japan because it identifies the Korean "minjung"
with the biblical Israelites and by doing so, the Japanese with
the biblical Egyptians. This alternative way of reading the
Scriptures as the book of sacred drama is the necessary ground
for Japanese Christians to have honest dialogue with Minjung
theology. It leads us to seek new ways not to remain as the
"oppressive Egyptians." Minjung theology as one of
the liberation theologies requests both the oppressed and the
oppressor to participate in the sacred drama. |
| Kane, Margaret. "Minjung Theology." Theology 90
(1987): 351-356. |
This article describes Korean minjung theology, the new force
it has given to my conviction that the future of Christianity
depends on working theologically with 'ordinary people', and
some clues as to its relevance in Britain, which may help us
to create our own indigenous theology. 'Minjung' means 'the
common people'. In particular it means those who are oppressed
politically or economically, who are alienated sociologically
or kept uneducated in cultural or intellectual matters. In other
words 'the underdogs'. (This is not the same as the Marxist
'proletariat'. Minjung is a form of liberation theology but,
as Koreans are from their experience particularly aware of communist
oppression, minjung theology differs significantly from Latin
American theology.) The 'underdogs' have a changing membership,
so minjung must be understood dynamically in historical, sociological
terms. |
| Kim, Chang-Nack. "Justification by Faith--A Minjung Perspective."
Chicago Theological Seminary Register 85 (1995): 14-23. |
The doctrine of justification cannot serve as the criterion
that differentiates Christianity from Judaism or Protestantism
from Roman Catholicism. Today almost all theologians, Catholic
or Protestant, accept the doctrine of justification as an article
of faith. However, the emphasis in interpretation and the depth
of understanding vary depending on denominations and individual
theologians. The task of today's lecture is to examine whether
the diverse interpretations of justification are consistent
with Paul's original idea of justification. |
| Kim, Chang-Nack. "Korean Minjung Theology: An Overview."
Chicago Theological Seminary Register 85 (1995): 1-13. |
A new name means a new being. just as in Rev. 2:17 "to
him who conquers will be given a name," a new name called
'minjung' has been given to the oppressed Korean people who
have been fighting for their liberation. With this designation
they have been able to realize themselves clearly as the subject
of their historical destiny. Thus we came to say that minjung
is the subject of history. The so-called "minjung theology"
was brought about as a response to the minjung movement or the
struggle for minjung's liberation in the 1970s by a few conscientious
theologians of Korea. The Sitz-im-Leben of minjung theology
is the struggle for minjung's liberation. Minjung theology is
not a classroom theology whereby one is leisurely sitting in
an ivory tower of the university and engaging in theological
speculation or conceptual activity. Minjung theology can have
its vitality and power only when it is rooted in the struggle
for minjung's liberation. Thus one cannot understand minjung
theology independently of the wider minjung movement in Korea. |
| Kim, Myung Hyuk. "The Concept of God in Minjung Theology
and Its Socio-Economic and Historical Characteristics."
Evangelical Review of Theology 14:2 (April 1990): 126-149. |
In this paper I have tried to describe the degeneration of
the concept of god which has taken place in the history of modern
thought, modern political theology and Minjung theology, as
well as the characteristics of the socio-economization of theology
which have resulted from it. Also, I have tried to point out
that one of the tasks of evangelical theology is to recover
the biblical concept of God in the church around the world. |
| Kim, Seyoon. "Is 'Minjung Theology' a Christian Theology?"
Calvin Theological Journal 22 (1987): 251-274. |
|
| Kim, Yong Bock. In Catalysing Hope for Justice: Essays in
Honour of C. I. Itty to Commemorate His Sixtieth Birthday, ed.
Wolfgang R. Schmidt, 146-153. Geneva: World Council of Churches,
1987. |
|
| Kim, Yong Bock. "Minjung Social Biography and Theology."
Asia Journal of Theology 1 (1987): 523-530. |
The story of the people has been a very important notion for
some theologians in Korea. Folk tales have been used to reveal
the historical reality of history, and theological reflections
on these tales have shown their meaning for today. Just as the
story has significance for its present teller, so are the theological
reflections on it relevant for today. In a similar way, social
biographies of the minjung are being widely used to reveal the
present social reality, for example, the story of workers, of
poor women farmers, or of the urban poor. Theological reflections
on these stories have been useful for the Christian witness
in Korea. In recent years, life stories of the poor have been
written by the poor themselves, published and given wide circulation.
Poetry and novels deal with the people's experiences--their
historical realities in the Korean society. Any theological
reflection in Korea is necessarily and inevitably set in the
context of the Korean people, and therefore, the stories of
the people become very important for Korean theologians. What
is the social biography of the people? It is the story of the
life of the people in their community. It is not merely a personal
biography, although no personal biography can be without community
dimensions. |
| Kim, Yong-bock. In God, Christ & God's People in Asia
as Seen by the Participants of the Consultation on the Theme
'Through a New Vision of God Towards the New Humanity in Christ'
Kyoto, 1994. ed. Dhyanchand Carr, 11-46. Hong Kong: Christian
Conference of Asia Theological Concerns, 1995. |
|
| Kim, Yong-Bock. "Minjung and Power: A Biblical and Theological
Perspective on Doularchy (Servanthood)." In Revolution
of Spirit: Ecumenical Theology in Global Context: Essays in
Honor of Richard Shaull, ed. Nantawan Boonprasat-Lewis, 215-30.
Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans, 1998. |
God's sovereignty is for the sovereignty of the minjung, debunking
the arche of the diabolos. Power does not have any independent
ontological status; it is non-being. Only the minjung can erect
the authority to rule; the minjung are sovereign; and the arche
is doulos. Doulos makes arche (servant makes master.) The doulos
are in common bond to establish exousia. The political economy
of the minjung is mutual servanthood and a mutual bond that
makes them sovereign and turns arche into doulos: doularchy,
which guarantees the minjung's participation as sovereign-in-bond
(covenant). This is radically different from social contract
theories. Doularchy in twenty-first-century politics should
mean that the minjung become a comprehensive sovereign in the
bond of servanthood, liberated and not enslaved, erect and not
bowed down. This means direct participation in authority and
politics by the mutually serving community for the enhancement
of all life; it means the covenant solidarity of all minjung
and all living things throughout the earth. |
| Koyama, Kosuke. "'Building the House by Righteousness'"
The Ecumenical Horizons of Minjung Theology." In An Emerging
Theology in World Perspective: Commentary on Korean Minjung
Theology, ed. Jung Y. Lee, 137-152. Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third
Publications, 1988. |
Minjung theology may be spoken of in a number of ways: a theology
in the Korean interrogation room; a Korean prison theology;
a theology of costly discipleship; a theology of dialogue with
destitutes and prostitutes; a theology between the underdog
and the topdog; a theology intersecting Korean culture and social
concerns; a theology of proclamation-preaching; a theology of
social justice in the perspective of the Lord's Supper; a theology
of politics of God; and so on. The Christian commitment and
passion that cuts through all these theological reflections
and actions is the conviction that "to know God" (theological
beholding) means concretely to stop building the house through
unrighteousness (ethical walking). This is the theme of minjung
theology. The theme suggests expanding ecumenical horizons and
corresponding theological challenges, "for this was not
done in a corner" (Acts 26:26). There are three relevant
questions related to minjung theology which must be asked and
are explored in this article: What is the ecumenical meaning
of the concepts presented by minjung theology in the areas-of
1) eschatology, 2) conflict and 3) culture? |
| Kuster, Volker. "Minjung Theology and Minjung Art."
Mission Studies 11:1 (1994): 108-29. |
Discusses the historical context of Korea, the development
and main ideas of Minjung theology as a context for discussing
minjung art. Three categories may be discussed: 1) cultural-religious
motifs, 2) scenes from the everyday life and its characters;
and 3) motifs deriving from political resistance and propaganda
art. |
| Lee, Jung Y., ed. An Emerging Theology in World Perspective:
Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology. Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third
Publications, 1988. |
|
| Miguez Bonino, Jose. "A Latin American Looks at Minjung
Theology." In An Emerging Theology in World Perspective:
Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung Y. Lee, 157-168.
Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third Publications, 1988. |
A couple of books and a few papers read, along with a visit
to Korea of five days, may be more than enough to awaken a deep
interest in and sympathy for minjung theology, but is hardly
sufficient to justify writing a paper about it. . . . We should
resist the temptation to arrive at premature syntheses or resolutions
of our pluralities of experience, interpretation, and reflection.
Nevertheless, we need to explore such pluralities in order to
learn from them, to test our interpretations, to deepen and
enrich our reflection. It is in this spirit that I venture to
reflect on what I have seen in minjung theology, in my admittedly
limited and insufficient encounters. The structure of this paper
is built around what I perceive as three main foci in minjung
theology: 1) minjung (the people), 2) han and 3) messianism.
I am trying in this way to avoid forcing the concerns of minjung
theology into my own framework. I hope this can help in the
kind of "active reception" which I think is necessary
for fruitful dialogue. |
| Miller, Paul M. "Pastoral Care of 'Demonized' Persons."
Journal of Theology for Southern Africa 12 (September 1975):
51-69. |
Fourteen point discussion on caring for the demonized in the
African context, involving meeting the whole needs of the person
by listening, understanding cultural elements of the story,
using the Bible (especially the epistles) and church history
as a starting point in finding ways to minister, warning people
about occultic involvement, etc. |
| Moon, Cyris H. "Minjung Theology." Ching Feng 26:1
(April 1983): 48-51. |
Although the roots of Minjung Theology go back much further,
it is true to say that since 1970 theologians in Korea have
been confronted with a different theological agenda. Industries
and university campuses,. ordinary people, intellectuals, laborers,
and even many literary critics have proclaimed the message of
liberation in the Bible in ways that are relevant to the current
economic-socio-political context of Korea. In this situation
we have been challenged to provide a biblical perspective for
understanding the reality of the people, especially of the minjung,
who are politically oppressed, impoverished, and subjected to
insult and contempt. This challenge has been an expression of
the minjung springing from their life situation in Korea. Thus
we begin to formulate a theology which can be addressed as "the
gospel" to the minjung. |
| Moon, Cyris Hee Suk. In Minjung Theology: People as the Subjects
of History, ed. Christian Conference of Asia, 119-135. Singapore:
Christian Conference of Asia, 1981. |
|
| Moon, Cyris Hee-Suk. "Culture in the Bible and the Culture
of the Minjung." Ecumenical Review 39 (1987): 180-186.
|
Explores the reality of two levels of culture: the culture
of the dominating class and the culture of the masses. Concludes:
The problem has been that with Christianity in general there
is a tendency to identify the gospel with the dominating culture.
The great task for us today is to liberate the gospel from the
dominating culture in order to serve the minjung of the world. |
| Mu, Ahn Byung. In Minjung Theology: People as the Subjects
of History, ed. Christian Conference of Asia, 136-151. Singapore:
Christian Conference of Asia, 1981. |
|
| Myong-Kwan, Chi. "Theological Development in Korea."
International Review of Mission 74:293 (January 1985): 73-79.
|
Describes minjung theology: Listening to the cries of Abel
has been the starting point for minjung theology in Korea; the
theologians who have enunciated this theology, based upon a
view of the people (minjung) as the subjects of history, have
appropriately described it as "theology from the scene,"
the scene of the people's workplaces, whether on the factory
floor or out in the fields. They point to the necessity of reading
and understanding the Bible and of reconstructing systematic
theology, Christian ethics and church history from the point
of view of the minjung. |
| Na, Yong Wha. "A Theological Assessment of Korean Minjung
Theology." Concordia Journal 14 (1988): 138-149. |
"Minjung" denotes "the people" literally,
and "the underdogs" figuratively. Minjung is understood
as those victims of social injustice. This, term has been used
in the political sense since 1970 by Korean historians, but
its politico-theological sense was introduced to minjung theologians
by Japanese theologians specializing in sociological hermeneutics.
Minjung theology is a theological product issuing from the background
of the Korean political situation of the 1970s. This study attempts
to show how seriously minjung theology deviates,, from the true
teachings of the Scriptures. At the same time, it contrasts
the teachings of minjung theology with the Scriptural meanings
of the Gospel, with the goal that we should be sure of the fact
that the kingdom of God can be planted only by the powerful
hand of the Triune God who primarily works through the preaching
of the Gospel. This study also attempts to verify whether minjung
theology is really even Korean theology or not. Minjung theologians
insist on using the Korean term "minjung" in order
to identify minjung theology as a Korean theology. Additionally,
in that minjung theology disregards the vertical dimension of
the Gospel, and even emphasizes the horizontal dimension, this
study also attempts to prove that minjung theology is defective
in giving as the theological motivation for its goal the establishment
of a new society of brotherly love. |
| Ogle, George. "A Missionary's Reflection on Minjung Theology."
In An Emerging Theology in World Perspective: Commentary on
Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung Y. Lee, 59-72. Mystic, CN:
Twenty-Third Publications, 1988. |
I wish to begin this paper by expressing deep gratitude to
those who, through their own sufferings, have formulated the
theology called minjung theology. It has a New Testament ring
to it that has persuaded me of its authenticity. And, those
who espouse it present such a genuine witness that I am convinced
of their apostolate. This article is, therefore, not a critique
of minjung theology. Rather, it is an essay based on my experiences
as a foreign missionary involved in Urban Industrial Mission
(UIM). Those experiences provided me with a unique exposure
to the han of Korea's industrial workers. This article is an
essay of appreciation to those who have been able to articulate
the hardships, and the significance of those hardships, borne
by the workers of Korea. South Korea has undergone considerable
industrial development in the last two decades. Much of the
credit for that development should go to Korea's workers but
it is credit they never receive. Most of the sacrifice and suffering
that has made progress possible has been that of the ordinary
factory worker. This essay is primarily a reflection upon the
han she and he endures. |
| Park, A. Sung. "Minjung Theology: A Korean Contextual
Theology." The Indian Journal of Theology 33:4 (Oct.-Dec.
1984): 1-11. |
This paper is written to introduce Minjung theology and to
discuss its salient points. Since Minjung theology is a theology
in the making, this paper attempts to show the growing edges
of this theology called Minjung. |
| Roberts, J. Deotis. "Black Theology and Minjung Theology:
Exploring Common Themes." In An Emerging Theology in World
Perspective: Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung
Y. Lee, 99-105. Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third Publications, 1988.
|
This discussion is an exercise in cross-cultural theological
conversation. In this paper I explore some common themes in
two theological traditions which may be designated generally
as "liberation theologies." . . . This brief excursion
into comparative theology has been a challenge. It is highly
suggestive of the rich possibilities toward human understanding
which could result from vigorous activity on this theological
frontier. In a comparison of black and minjung theologies, we
note important differences. But our concern has been to highlight
the similarities. We have drawn upon the affinity of worldviews
among AfroAmericans and Asians. There is also a cluster of similar
factors in both backgrounds which result in a holistic ethico-religious
outlook. When we translate this into biblical terms, it leads
to a view which blends social justice concerns with the healing
dimensions of the gospel. In both instances the exodus theme
points to the message of the prophets of the Hebrew Scriptures
who denounced oppression and advocated justice as well as mercy.
Again, both black and minjung theologies seek to find the historical
Jesus and the secular meaning of the gospel for human liberation.
This in no way dilutes the meaning and power associated with
the cross-resurrection event. The Christ of faith is Lord, but
he is also Liberator. In these and other ways black and minjung
theologies may open new doors to cross-cultural understanding
and the ecumenical dialogue and mission of the church of Jesus
Christ. |
| Russell, Letty M. "Minjung Theology in Women's Perspective."
In An Emerging Theology in World Perspective: Commentary on
Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung Y. Lee, 75-95. Mystic, CN:
Twenty-Third Publications, 1988. |
In this response I try to stand in solidarity with the minjung
theologians as I listen and learn from their work. I also seek
to reflect critically on minjung theology from a feminist perspective
by sharing points of convergence and difference that I consider
important in the development of both rninjung and feminist theologies.
Lastly, I attempt to highlight the ongoing concerns and work
of Asian and Korean women theologians. |
| Song, Choan-Seng. "Building a Theological Culture of
People." In An Emerging Theology in World Perspective:
Commentary on Korean Minjung Theology, ed. Jung Y. Lee, 119-134.
Mystic, CN: Twenty-Third Publications, 1988. |
Reflects on minjung theology, dealing with the ways it cuts
against the status quo and how it has been attacked, the nature
of the shamanism (which is the religion of the minjung), the
reality that theology is not just abstract ideas but the life
of the minjung, and the essence of han. |
| Suh, David Kwang-sun. "A Theology by Minjung." In
Theology by the People: Reflections on Doing Theology in Community,
ed. Samuel Amirtham and John S. Pobee, 65-77. Geneva: World
Council of Churches, 1986. |
Describes minjung theology as a story-telling theology of
the masses. "The stories told by the people in their suffering
and praxis to change the world, that is, the socio-biography
of the people, and the stories told by Jesus about the kingdom,
that is, the theological biography of Jesus--these are the bases
and foundations of theology by the people. The theology of story-telling
or the theology of rumour-mongering is the privileged way of
doing theology by the people." |
| Suh, David Kwang-Sun. In Asian Christian Spirituality: Reclaiming
Traditions, ed. Virginia Fabella, Peter K. H. Lee, and David
Kwang-Sun Suh, 31-36. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1992. |
|
| Suh, David Kwang-Sun. "Minjung Theology: The Politics
and Spirituality of Korean Christianity." In Perspectives
on Christianity in Korea and Japan: The Gospel and Culture in
East Asia, ed. Mark R. Mullins and Richard Fox Young, Lewiston,
NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1995. |
Introduces Minjung theology, including: its development in
the 1970s, the way it looked at church history and mission history,
its role as a political theology, its role as a cultural theology,
its development in the 1980s, and a projection on the future
of minjung theology. Concludes: "Minjung theology is still
very much alive as we look at our theological world of today
both here and abroad. For it is our common task to liberate
theology and to make it return again and again to its proper
task of liberating human beings from all forms of exploitation,
oppression, and alienation." |
| Suh, David Kwang-Sun "Theology of Story Telling: A Theology
by Minjung." Ministerial Formation 31 (1985): 10-22. |
The minjung theology of Korea has taken its name as theologians
and young workers, students priests and pastors met together
and told each other stories over food and drinks. Friends gathered
together secretly in eating places, not to discuss some great
theologian's recent systematic theology, but to exchange rumors.
Minjung theology has been formed to tell the stories of the
minjung, the people, the suffering teenage female factory workers,
the students who were court-martialed, the university professors
and newspaper reporters who were kidnapped and abused in the
torture chambers of the Korean CIA. Minjung theology has been
formed in the stories told and the rumors spread among the fighting
and suffering people of Korea in the 1970s. These stories were
forbidden to be printed in the newspapers. Anybody who talked
in public about student demonstrations and professors' arrests
and young workers' strikes would be sent to jail on the charges
of spreading "false The true stories of the people were
censored, while false stories of development and national security
dominated the front pages of the Korean news media. |
| Sundermeier, Theo. "Minjung Theology of Korea."
Scriptura 22 (1987): 48-59. |
|
| Tang, Edmund. "Shamanism and Minjung Theology in South
Korea." In Popular Religion, Liberation and Contextual
Theology: Papers from a Congress (January 3-7, 1990, Nijmegen,
the Netherlands) Dedicated to Arnulf Camps OFM, ed. Jacques
Van Nieuwenhove and Berma Klein Goldewijk, 165-74. Kampen, Netherlands:
J. H. Kok, 1991. |
Popular religions or popular religiosity is becoming more
and more a central challenge to the emerging contextual theologies
of the world, particularly in the so-called Third World. As
we survey the emerging theologies of Asia, we can find an abundance
of examples. In the Philippines, theologians have attempted
to construct a Christology in terms of the Black Messiah of
the popular Easter rites. Indian theologians have devoted an
important amount of research to the popular devotions and processions
which have attracted not only Christians but Hindus to their
devotional practices. But it is in the "minjung theology"
of South Korea and the "homeland theology" of Taiwan
that we find the clearest examples of this shift in theological
research. It could be very interesting to make a comparative
study of the latter theologies, since both share similar societal
structures, histories of colonization as well as a Presbyterian
background. Unfortunately, the present stage of research does
not permit such a study beyond general observations. In the
following we shall limit ourselves only to the minjung theology
which has made a very clear option to build its foundation on
the shamanist undercurrent of Korean history. |
| Younghak, Hyun. "The Cripple's Dance and Minjung Theology."
Ching Feng 28:1 (March 1985): 30-35. |
Beggars are looked down on in Korean culture, and crippled
beggars engage in dance to entertain and have people contribute
to their needs. As a child the author used to ridicule the cripple's
dance, but now see them as valid expressions of the minjung
enacting their own tragedies of deformity and celebration intermingled,
which compels us to recognize and respect their humanity. |
|